Overpopulation: Earth’s Destruction

Amanda Broxton Instructor Sabel Composition II throw and Effect Essay May 28th, 2009 Overpopulation Earths Destruction target you picture it? On one side of the world, in the middle of nowhere, a wantlyly beautiful child is just skin and bones on the other side, a nonher animal that privyister not be replaced has gone extinct. Somewhere at that place is a woman washing her some attribute in a dirty, polluted river. These and galore(postnominal) other events like them argon taking place completely over the world. The cause?Over popularization, on which has been the root of mevery problems and is caused by umteen others, but do not worry there might be some hope in fixing it. Due to over popularization, one of Earths podecadetial destruction is caused by over- payoff of the land. From more and more animals going extinct that can not be replaced because there isnt room for them to live on. alike because of this, there is not enough food and clean water for valet de chambre and animals alike. Plus, valet de chambres are not conserving resources as they should and are taking rush land to pile more and more people on. Environmentalists form bulky been c formerlyrned about the resources threatened by rapidly growing human populations, focusing on phenomenon such(prenominal) as deforestation, desertification, air pollution and ball-shaped warming. But the worst-case scenario for people experiencing overpopulation, according to Lawrence Smith, president of the Population Institute, is a wish of fresh, clean water. If the water goes, the species goes, he said. (Hoevel, 2008, para. 9). Equally important is the fact that this is all caused by us Homo sapiens looking for a ruin lifestyle.We now have new medicines and technologies to help us live thirster by healing every little thing that might be wrong with us. Some of those things were introduced by Mother Nature to kill us off to keep everything equal. We besides have higher kin range produced by more people having healthier births and multiple births. Furthermore, these children are animated through earlier childhood killing diseases with the aforementioned medicines and technologies. Until recently, birth range and death rates were about the same, keeping the population stable. People had many children, but a large number of them died before age five.During the industrial Revolution, a period of history in Europe and North the States where there were great advances in science and technology, the success in step-down death rates was attributable to several factors (1) in-creases in food production and distribution, (2) improvement in public health (water and sanitation), and (3) medical technology (vaccines and antibiotics), on with gains in education and standards of living within many developing nations. Without these attributes throw in many childrens lives, they could not have survived common diseases like rubeola or the flu.People were able to fight and cure dea dly germs that once killed them. (Kinder, 2009, para. 10). Not to worry though, there are some ways that this disagreement maybe reversed. They may not be what many people would honor of, but at least they are ideas of what we could do. That this one for instance, at the give up of each month we would tally all the births. Then picking at random from those people that are on death-row or even in prison or jail for life for longer then ten years, would have the honor of helping with the equalization of the birth-to-death ratio.If nothing else, after a few years, this should deter hard crime. Each country and/or fix would be responsible for The Equalization Program. There is also the idea of reinstating the cardinal birth policy (China had this policy at one time) with a few minor adjustments. One being that right after the second birth there would be a mandatory sterilization of the mother and father, and any other men over fifty years of age would also have to be sterilization. Those that wanted another child would then have to adopt those children that unfortunately dont have a home. In conclusion, sure over popularization has many causes and it may cause many problems, but at least there are some solutions that can be looked at. I did not say that many people would like them but theyre there. In the end, I hope that things can be equaled out so that we do not have to put such a strain on our one and only earth. If we destroy it, there is not another one that we can start over on. spring cited